A compliance management system (CMS): what is it?

A CMS: What is it?

An integrated system called a compliance management system (CMS) is utilized to comply with corporate regulations, industry standards, and regulatory obligations. Organizations may prevent non-compliance areas and maintain continuous regulatory compliance with the aid of an efficient CMS.

Read More: NERC Compliance Software

A compliance management system is exactly what its name implies: a system. It is made up of a variety of tools, business procedures, and internal controls that cooperate to lower compliance risk and assist firms in fulfilling their compliance obligations rather than relying on a single piece of technology or procedure. Risk analyses and compliance training are only two examples of what might be included in a compliance management system.

An organization’s compliance initiatives and overall risk management strategy depend on having an efficient compliance management system. This is necessary since breaking compliance rules can have serious repercussions, such as penalties, lost revenue, and a higher chance of data breaches.

These days, compliance management systems frequently operate with a high level of automation and proactively detect possible hazards, enabling businesses to instantly address compliance concerns and take remedial action.

A compliance management system as opposed to compliance management

Though they are technically distinct, compliance management and compliance management systems are closely connected.

The more comprehensive approach that a business takes to follow rules is referred to as compliance management. On the other hand, a compliance management system (CMS) is the useful collection of instruments and regulations that are employed to automate and optimize these compliance procedures. Stated differently, a CMS is the workable solution, and compliance management is the overarching strategy.

What makes a CMS crucial?

Organizations now have to deal with an increasing amount of industry and jurisdiction-specific compliance laws. These compliance rules are frequently intricate and sector-specific, such as GDPR for the European Union or HIPAA for the healthcare sector.

Heavy penalties and legal issues are frequently the result of breaking these regulatory restrictions. For example, in May 2023, the California-based Meta was fined USD 1.3 billion by Ireland’s data protection regulator for violating the GDPR.

Furthermore, customer perceptions of cybersecurity and compliance concerns are changing. Eighty-five percent of participants in a recent McKinsey poll felt that understanding a company’s data privacy policy was crucial before making a purchase. Companies are beginning to realize that complying with regulations isn’t only necessary; in fact, it may even be advantageous to their operations.

Nevertheless, following compliance requirements might be difficult. Many businesses are becoming more and more global, with offices all over the world, staff members and clients in several countries, and various legal needs for each. Keeping up with compliance standards may prove to be challenging for these firms, particularly given the constant changes in laws and regulations brought about by new technological advancements. Every time an organization implements a new business initiative or data-handling technique, they run the danger of adding even more layers of compliance complexity.

Organizations may navigate this complicated regulatory environment and maintain compliance with the aid of a compliance management system (CMS). It makes it simpler to react to changing legal requirements and regulations and to automatically check for areas of non-compliance in almost real-time.

Organizations may tailor their approach to comply with industry-specific rules and standards and standardize their compliance activities across areas with the help of an efficient CMS. In a broader sense, a CMS aids in enforcing moral principles and creating an environment that values corporate responsibility and compliance.

The compliance management system’s three primary components.

Although a successful CMS might include many other components, these three are often at its core:

The board of directors

The board of directors is primarily concerned with establishing a compliance culture at the top. They might not want to prioritize compliance given all of their other duties, but in the end, it is their job to create and run a compliance management program.

Following the creation of an efficient CMS, they should inform top management, as well as other firm stakeholders and external parties like contractors and third-party service providers, of the policies.

Organizations cannot demonstrate that they are serious about compliance and have standardized procedures that enable all members of the organization to abide by federal consumer protection laws and regulations unless they have board supervision.

Officer of compliance

In order to oversee management effectively and lead the compliance function, senior management can also choose to designate a chief compliance officer or manager. In order to keep the Board informed about compliance concerns and enable them to make necessary tactical and strategic modifications to the compliance management program, these executives often provide regular and direct reports to the Board.

Among the duties that compliance officers may have are:

establishing and carrying out rules and procedures for compliance

ensuring that management and employees receive in-depth instruction on consumer protection laws and regulations

assessing newly-emerging compliance concerns and possible hazards

addressing concerns from customers using a systematic, well recorded procedure

presenting the Board with compliance audit results and actions

putting remedial measures into place and updating the compliance program on a regular basis

Program for compliance

The core of a compliance management system is the compliance program. It acts as the focal point for creating and putting into practice all compliance controls and safeguards. These programs usually consist of senior management-enforced organized rules, procedures, and practices, including as internal controls and compliance procedures.

Risk analyses, staff training, reporting systems, remedial measures, compliance audits, and compliance monitoring are all possible components of a well-designed compliance program.

The compliance program is the official compliance guide that employees should consult. In this manner, everyone follows the same set of guidelines and fulfills their compliance obligations in a reliable and consistent manner. Because of this, it’s also critical to develop a systematic compliance training program so that staff members are aware of their roles and can comply with internal rules and current compliance requirements.

Additionally, organizations have to think about creating transparent and standardized reporting systems. This improves productivity and communication and enables compliance teams to delegate work to the right employees using well-defined processes that monitor requests and remedial measures.

Reaction to customer complaints

Organizations can find possible problems with regulatory compliance by using consumer complaints. Customers are frequently the first to identify possible dangers, thus promptly handling complaints from them may increase customer loyalty and assist businesses in taking prompt corrective action to prevent fines from the authorities. Furthermore, regulatory bodies frequently examine how companies manage customer complaints, so prompt and efficient responses can enhance an organization’s regulatory position and compliance.

Audit of compliance

An additional crucial element of any compliance management system is compliance audits. These audits, which can be internal or external, entail a dispassionate evaluation of how well a business complies with internal rules, processes, and legal obligations. They are essential for detecting any compliance concerns and ensuring continuous compliance.

Unbiased external auditors often offer an impartial assessment of compliance procedures and policies for external audits. On the other hand, an internal audit is usually carried out by the organization’s internal audit department. Both kinds of impartial audits have to end with audit reports that provide conclusions and recommendations for enhancement.

Compliance audits can offer organizations—especially bigger ones—more checks and balances and increased compliance rigor because of their independence. They can also be shared with regulatory bodies to show accountability in the event of a regulatory audit. They can also function as a historical record for compliance efforts.

Even though compliance audits may be stressful, companies can make the process run more smoothly by keeping well-organized records and being knowledgeable about the applicable standards, which will make it easier for auditors to find the information they need quickly.

Organizations can carry out risk assessments and continuous compliance monitoring in between compliance audits.

monitoring compliance

Monitoring compliance entails keeping a close eye on operations to spot non-compliant regions. It supports businesses in upholding legal standards and immediately defending the rights of customers. Compliance monitoring assists in the early detection of possible hazards and facilitates prompt rectification and remedial action to stop recurrence.

Employee interviews, policy and procedure reviews, training effectiveness evaluations, and comparing actual practices with external disclosures are some other means of monitoring compliance. By using these steps, firms may keep an eye on compliance initiatives in real time and make any adjustments to their compliance management system.